Monthly Archives: November 2008

Avatar photo

Millenial Learners Are Unique, but They’re Not the Jetsons

I just attended the 2008 Lilly Conference on College Teaching where the theme was “Millenial Learning: Teaching in the 21st Century.” I enjoyed some of the keynote presentations, especially Erica McWilliam’s presentation, “Is Creativity Teachable? Conceptualizing the Creativity/Pedagogy Relationship in Higher Education.” In the presentation, McWilliam noted that creativity is not only vital in the arts, but is also in scientific disciplines where creative thinking leads to key breakthroughs.

While McWilliam believes creativity can be taught, she claimed that it cannot be done simply by giving students free reign of their learning experience. She addressed a critical flaw in the rejection of the traditional sage-on-the-stage model of instruction in favor of the guide-on-the-side approach. According to McWilliam, this trend encourages instructors to become too passive and compromises the level of rigor we traditionally associate with more structured courses and teaching methods. Instead, McWilliam proposed an approach she calls “meddler in the middle.” This approach encourages experiential learning and assignments that foster independent, critical thinking. However, it requires faculty to be actively involved along the way, setting high standards for success and rejecting the notion that all answers are valid.

While I enjoyed some of the keynote presentations at the Lilly Conference, I have to admit that there was also a thorough beating of the dead horse that is the “millenial student.” Several of the presenters rattled off the same sweeping generalizations about the millennial generation that I’ve heard so often at past conferences, including classics like, “They’re multitasking visual learners,” “They prefer to learn by doing,” and everyone’s favorite, “They’re incredibly tech savvy.”

Even if some of these statements are exaggerations, they’re not particularly harmful because most of them are based on facts or at least a relatively scientific survey. However, I find it hard to hide my annoyance when someone tells yet another anecdote about the now-famous (yet nameless) young college student who text messages her friends while listening to her latest class lectures on her iPod and updating her Facebook page—all while driving to her apartment in the sky in a flying hovercar.

It seems no educational-technology conference presentation is complete these days without the obligatory stock photo of a hip, young student with a laptop tucked under his arm, iPod headphones in his hears, a video game controller in one hand, a cell phone in the other. This photo is usually a warning that the presenter is about to describe a bleeding-edge case study that will make use of Second Life, Twitter, Facebook, or some other tool that is revolutionizing education as we know it.

The problem with this recurring emphasis on millenials and their insatiable appetite for bleeding-edge technology is that it makes faculty feel they’re always behind the times. Most of the instructors I know are excited if they can figure out how to embed a YouTube video in Blackboard or insert an audio file in a PowerPoint presentation. Now imagine how those instructors must feel when they go to a conference to discover that PowerPoint and YouTube are “so five years ago.”

I’ll be the first to admit that I’m a part of the problem. I just gave a presentation titled “Beyond PowerPoint and YouTube: Making the Most of Multimedia for Language Instruction” at the fall conference for the Illinois Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. The session was packed and the attendees were very eager to learn. However, it was clear to me based on their questions and feedback that they would have been just as happy with a session titled, “PowerPoint Tips and Tricks: Making the Most of the Everyday Tool You’ve Never Had Time to Master.”

I’m certainly no PowerPoint evangelist. I like building educational mini-games in Flash, trying out new blogging and wiki tools, and encouraging faculty to use services and sites that often include the world “beta” in their logos. However, I think it’s important to admit that the simplest solution for presenting instructional material is often the best. For many professors, that solution is PowerPoint.

Occasionally, instructors might want a feature that PowerPoint can’t offer. They might want students to be able to view presentations in their web browsers and comment on them. They might want students to be able to create their own presentations with audio-narration and easily share them with others. When those needs arise, it’s important to offer them the simplest, most reliable solution that gets them from point A to point B. If a French professor wants students to create narrated cultural tours of Paris, we should introduce that professor to VoiceThread. We shouldn’t encourage her to establish an island in Second Life, hire three graduate students to build a replica of central Paris, and force her students to create avatars and chat in French inside a bad recreation of the Hall of Mirrors at Versailles.

If you’d like to know more about alternatives to PowerPoint and the features they provide, you can view the multimedia presentation tools comparison I put together in October of 2008. All of the sites listed feature tools I’ve actually tried myself, and I’ve included the pros and cons I discovered after creating and uploading test presentations of my own. Some of the tools I’ve highlighted (e.g., Google Docs) might not win me any awards for being on the bleeding edge of instructional technology. However, as someone who knows a lot of professors, I know from experience that it’s important not to overestimate the tech needs and wants of faculty. And as a student who is technically a millennial by some definitions, I think it’s important not to overestimate the tech needs and wants of millenials. After all, I’m living proof that some millenials are happy with a traditional, well-delivered lecture with minimal fuss. And for the record, I’ve never text messaged a friend while updating my Facebook page.

Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to take my hovercar in for servicing. My info console has been acting up and it won’t play my video mail or let me make online bill payments while driving at hyperspeed.

ADCL or “Do We Really Need Another Acronym?”

Acronyms are introduced regularly in many contexts, not only to facilitate repeated reference to certain terms but also to imply wide acceptance of and add an air of importance to proposed ideas, processes, or methodologies. Instructional design loves acronyms. The buzz-cronyms of the hour include BD, PBL, TBL, and LCI (or LCT) (clues below).

Contributing to this long list, and in many ways consolidating it, I propose ADCL or Assessment-Driven Collaborative Learning. Details will be published in one of the 2009 volumes of Symposium, the journal of the College Music Society. In the meantime, here is a teaser:

ADCL incorporates features of backward design and project- and team-based learning in contexts that highlight student responsibility, all materialized through a series of graded team projects and enhanced by instructor guidance and feedback throughout the project-drafting process. Such design supports a) student motivation and engagement, b) meaningful instructor-to-student and student-to-student interactions, c) instructor- and peer-led learning, and d) formative and summative assessment, by wrapping a course around a single set of manageable, self-contained, resource-supported, and interrelated group assignments. Group assignment responses are drafted and submitted online in instructor-moderated discussion forums.

Evidence, collected over two years of using this technique and formally comparing it to more traditional instructional methods, suggests that ADCL maximizes a course’s learning impact and utilizes the instructor’s expertise and time most effectively and efficiently.

So no, we may not need one more acronym, but I believe we can do with one more effort to improve our students’ learning.

More next time…

Avatar photo

Extracurricular Activities Online

When I began my undergrad in 2002, I was a fairly shy kid and had moved to a college two states away where I didn’t know anyone. I never would have thought that in three years I’d have been a founding member of an environmental club, vice president of a literary magazine, and the organizer of a writer’s group.

It’s difficult to overstate how much of an effect these student organizations had on the trajectory of my life. The environmental club implemented the college’s first recycling program, for which we needed to interact with college administrators and county officials. This was my first experience navigating different levels of organizational hierarchy to implement a program. We also networked with regional environmental advocacy to educate students about issues and mobilize them in petition and letter-writing campaigns, which provided me a taste of politics.

My role in this organization was one of the first items on my resume and gave me something to talk about in my first few job interviews. I likely would not have been seriously considered for my AmeriCorps position after college without it. But not only that, it provided me with leadership skills, teamwork experience, and a broad knowledge base in a subject other than my academic major.

The benefits of a traditional college experience are not limited to what students get from classes. College life provides an abundance of other enrichment opportunities, such as performances, symposia, and student organizations. And I worry that online students don’t have as much of an opportunity to tap into those activities.

Even if we accept that the majority of online students are nontraditional learners who are taking classes online precisely because they have complicated schedules that would not accommodate these activities, I wonder if more could be done to promote a well-rounded education among online learners.

Let’s look at student organizations, for example. In many ways, college campuses are unique environments as crucibles for grassroots organization, be it an activist political organization or a Frisbee club. It’s obviously easier for the first buds of a student organization to form on a traditional campus as classmates make small talk, share interests, and become friends.

But it’s important to remember that student organizations don’t simply emerge from the ether. There are physical and bureaucratic structures on every campus that promote their existence. There are designated meeting spaces for these organizations to use. There are bulletin boards used to advertise meetings and events. There is funding set aside for student-organization activities. There is a procedure in place for the college to legitimize the organization.

Without these physical and organizational elements, campuses would not enjoy the level of student enrichment they do today. And I fear that as universities expand into online classes, they’re missing opportunities to provide the full student experience to their online learners.

Of course, there’s nothing to stop online students from using third-party social-networking Web sites right now to form student organizations. Students can use something like Facebook’s Group feature to organize and Skype’s video conferencing for meetings. But the farther students need to reach outside their institution’s online learning environment to form these groups, the more initiative it takes, and the less likely they are to do it. I think we’ll only see a richness of online-student activities that approaches that of traditional students if we offer a comparable infrastructure to that of the brick-and-mortar institutions.

But how would one build a comparable infrastructure online? Perhaps each college or academic program could operate its own online discussion board, linked to existing student accounts, providing students the opportunity to share resources, experiences, and ideas.

As these discussions expose shared ideas, desires, and interests, students can form groups that meet synchronously through applications like Wimba. Tools like Blackboard Community System, a comparable software package to Blackboard Academic Suite, allows student groups to have their own uniquely branded space within the online learning environment. A student group using this as its hub could provide information, create discussions, or set up Wimba sessions for audio and video conferencing.

There are innumerable tools that could be integrated with the online learning environment in innumerable ways. But I hope that as online education progresses, extracurricular activity becomes more and more a standard part of the experience so that online learners have the same opportunities for growth that I did.

Avatar photo

Grasping a Definition (and a Pronunciation) through 1-Click AnswersTM

Yesterday, a friend of mine sent me a link to a New York Times article written by Stanley Fish on the Power of Passive Campaigning. Being a nonnative speaker and not born to the Christian culture, I found a number of the terms and references Dr. Fish used unfamiliar. So I tried to learn the definition of these words through my usual method: highlight the word, copy it, open Answers.com, and paste the word into the search field. However, this time when I highlighted a word, a little question mark icon showed up at the upper right corner. Out of curiosity, I clicked on the icon, and guess what I found—a pop-up window with an Answers.com page giving me everything I wanted to know about the word! A closer look at the header of the pop-up window told me that this was a New York Times reference search powered by Answers.com. The word “powered” is used very appropriately here, because the function did serve to empower this online newspaper by offering users like me an easy way to access the meaning of every single word in an article.

Answers.com is an online dictionary, encyclopedia, and much more. While visitors usually come to the site to find the meaning of a word, one can always find much more. The site offers visitors a whole spectrum of meanings, examples, related Wikipedia pages, and references.

As a first generation immigrant to the United States, I came to the country at age twenty-four. To make up that twenty-four years’ absence of both culture and language, I have to absorb like a sponge every piece of linguistic, cultural, and historical information in my daily surroundings, from Winnie the Pooh to the Keating Five. In this journey of language, culture, and knowledge acquisition, a tool like Answers.com provides me with a vehicle to ride on, and it makes this trip fun and safe.

Why safe? Because it saves me from any embarrassing language clashes. Like most English-as-a-second-language people, I learned most English words by reading them in books without hearing them pronounced. For those words, especially the odd-looking ones, I would not dare to speak them until I’ve checked with one of my native-speaker friends. And that friend, now, is Answers.com, who gives me the pronunciation of every word. I know some other online dictionaries, such as Merriam Webster, have an audio file attached to the word as well, but Answers.com also gives you the translation of the word in multiple languages. So if I’m really not getting a clue from the English explanation, I can always scroll down to check its Chinese translation as a last resort.

While writing this blog, I found some exciting new tools on Answers.com, and they’re free! One of them is a download called 1-Click AnswersTM. Once it is installed in your computer, you can Alt-click (click while holding the Alt key) any word in any program to get an AnswerTip, which is a short version of the Answers page; and if that doesn’t satisfy you, you can click “Read More” to get the full Answers.com entry. So if the publishers of the site you are reading have not become as thoughtful as New York Times, you can download 1-Click AnswersTM.

Many publishers—blog masters and Web masters—are becoming more sensible to the needs of readers like me. WordPress.org, for example, has added AnswersLink as a plug-in to allow blogger to link a word to Answers.com by simply clicking the AnswersLink button on the tool bar.

Research has shown that it takes 5 to 16 encounters for one to truly master a word. And how many words are in the English language? According to WikiAnswers, there are 171,476. Even if you only need a quarter of that for daily communication, we are still talking about 42, 869 words or 214,345 to 685,604 encounters for someone who didn’t get the words through any natural context as a native speaker. But even for native speakers, acquisition of vocabularies remains a learning task from kindergarten through adulthood. And this task becomes more demanding for any discipline that has specialized vocabularies for its own field, such as biology and physiology. So even by simplifying some of the encounters from multiple steps of copying and pasting to one-click access (I guess we can forget about flipping through the dictionaries now), thoughtful technology like 1-click Answers is making a big a contribution to boosting the efficacy of learning.

1-click Answers on a Word document