Avatar photo

Course Design: Behind the Curtain

  Reading time 12 minutes

Our department is tasked with providing online-course design services to faculty. This seems like a straightforward job description, but there is quite a lot that goes on behind the scenes, and some of it may not even be readily apparent upon first glance. Today, I’m going to pull back the curtain and let you in on our "secrets" to give you a little better idea of what actually goes into the instructional- and course-design process. Here’s what happens when we design your course from start to finish, in a more or less orderly fashion:

  1. Course site structure – It is important to provide a concise, consistent structure for the course, so that both you and your students can easily navigate the site without getting confused. In many of our colleges and schools, we provide a template model that contains many of the most common documents and tools and a consistent structure for course content. The main objective here is to make sure that students always know what comes next from week to week. This also helps you as you are deciding where things should appear in the course. We try and find strategies to minimize the apparent complexity of your course materials; even though students might be doing many complex tasks for you from week to week, it helps their confidence a lot to see something that looks manageable rather than unwieldy.

  2. Document design and conversion – The initial response from most faculty to having a course site is to simply upload everything they have, and use the site as a dumping ground for course documents such as syllabi, readings, and assignments. In many cases these documents are in a wide variety of formats, which can cause issues for some students. For example, not every student has Word or PowerPoint, so placing documents in your course of this type may occasionally cause problems for students. We solve this problem by taking all of that content and converting it into Web-friendly formats. Many text documents are converted to HTML, PowerPoints are uploaded to one or more online sources so that they can be shown online without forcing students to download, and Web links are consolidated into a single document to minimize the amount of searching and clicking students have to do. There are a number of hidden advantages to this: using HTML can make a Word document that had been 800 KB into something that is now 8 KB, so your course site will load faster, and students can view your documents online without having to download them. Creating online versions of PowerPoints enables students to watch the content online, take notes, and fast forward, pause, and rewind in a way they couldn’t do with a traditional file. Using HTML files enables us to apply a consistent formatting to documents, which makes your course site look better and also reduces student confusion; things look like they belong together. Furthermore, this formatting allows you to provide descriptive text about the content you are using. You can group a presentation, link to some relevant documents and external websites in the same content page, and provide descriptions of why this stuff matters and how it is interrelated. Students go to one place for everything they will need to read, watch and prepare for whatever weekly assessments you will be giving them. Contrast this with the old way, where you give them a bunch of documents to download. You are essentially saying, "Here’s some stuff. How’s it related? You figure it out."

  3. Objective and assessment design – You know what is going to happen in your course. You know what your outcomes should be for each student by the time they have completed the course. But do your students? We spend a lot of time working with faculty to make sure the objectives for their courses are attainable, measurable, and understandable to students. We teach courses all the time and assume that we are on the same page as our students. We teach the stuff and they learn it, right? To illustrate, in a certain week, what you really want is for your students to thoroughly understand Concept X. If you write an objective that says, "By the end of this week, students will understand Concept X," the first thing I’m going to say to you is, "Prove it." "Understand" is a pretty vague term in this case; it can vary widely from student to student, and in this abstract it is very hard to ensure that each student has attained the level of "understanding" you are looking for. Instead we recommend something like, "Describe the importance of Concept X in a marketing campaign with regard to personal and professional courtesy," or "Apply Concept X in creating visual resources for a marketing campaign." These objectives are then followed up with an assignment or assessment that really demonstrates to you that they do understand. The objective asking them to describe could be assessed with a written paper; the apply objective could see them creating visual aids for a campaign they are designing as part of the coursework. These assessments are then packaged into a convenient online format, so in most cases you can collect and grade entirely online. There are even tools to check the Web for plagiarism when students hand in papers!

  4. Quizzes and Exams – If you’ve never given an exam online, you really should give it a try. All of those paper quizzes you used to give can be given online, and in the majority of cases can be made to grade themselves, so you get all that time back for instruction. Some instructors worry about the possibility of students cheating on online exams; the reality is that it is actually a lot harder depending on how you set up the exam. Some instructors create multiple versions of an exam to make it tougher to cheat. Well, imagine if you could give forty (or more!) students an entirely individualized exam, where no one would have the same questions, at least not in the same order, and with even the answer choices randomized. Furthermore, you can specify a time limit short enough that they can’t refer to their textbook if they want to answer all the questions in time and even password-protect your exam to make sure they only take the exam when you want them to. Try doing that on paper!

  5. Audio and video production – Although we have a Media Production and Training department that handles the actual filming process and production, especially if you have a lot of videos, and our library handles digitizing and rights for longer copyrighted videos, we may help with the filming of screencasted lectures, audio podcast production, and the placement of all of these things into your course site. In many cases, we handle the transference of audiovisual resources from wherever they are into the final forms that will be perused by students. Some designers are experienced enough with the technology and production methods that they choose to do this stuff themselves. Either way, our primary concern is that these resources are integrated into the rest of your course materials in a way that is meaningful to your students and that shows them in context with the rest of the related materials.

  6. Creating custom applications – In some cases, there may be a need for an exercise or application in your course that cannot be handled by an existing resource, such as with the tools provided in your course site or by finding something on the Web. In these cases, we may build a custom application for you. This is a time-intensive project, and not something we do very often, but some of the FITS staff have expertise in these areas, and can build custom games or other programs for your course that will provide yet another way to get the point across to your students.

  7. Course QA – Arguably the final step with every course design is quality assurance, where we check the site from beginning to end, inside and out, to make sure you and your students are getting what was asked for. Here is a sample list of what we look for:

      1. Is the site orderly and easy to navigate?
      2. Are the majority of files in the most universal format possible? (Will they work on many different computers with many different kinds of software?)
      3. Do all of the links within the site go where they are supposed to? Are there any that need to be fixed?
      4. Do all of the images display as intended?
      5. Are there typos or grammatical errors that must be corrected?
      6. Do all of the multimedia resources work as intended? Are they as universal as possible?
      7. Is your gradebook properly set up to calculate student grades as it should be?
      8. Do your course objectives map into the exercises and assessments you have chosen properly?
      9. Are audio, video, and text articles you have chosen provided in the site in a way that will comply with copyright and fair use laws?
      10. For any materials you have chosen to date-restrict on the site, are they correct?
      11. If you are using course tools not available by default, are they available and properly configured?

Just as there are an incredible variety of courses, there are an incredible variety of options available to you in course sites. If you can dream it, there is probably a way to do it somehow, or we might just make one up. Just ask us! One of our favorite parts of this job is to go where none have gone before; we love breaking new ground just as much as you do, so we invite you to put us to the test. Contact your FITS consultant for more information. We can be found at http://fits.depaul.edu/Contacts/Pages/default.aspx.

Avatar photo

About Josh Lund

Josh Lund is an Instructional Technology Consultant at DePaul, and a former teacher turned mad scientist. After completing a B.M. in Music Theory/Composition at St. Olaf College and an M.M. in Composition at Northern Illinois University, he spent six years teaching instrumental music at Elgin Academy, William Penn University, and Central College. He also worked as an active performer and clinician before returning to Illinois to complete a second master’s degree in Instructional Technology at Northern Illinois. A life straddling two different disciplines, technology and the fine arts, has led him to researching teaching technology in the collaborative arts, multimedia and recording technologies, and user interface design . He is really enjoying the fact that his job lets him play with technology tools all day and then teach others to use them. Josh still writes and performs on occasion, teaches the occasional wayward bass or guitar student, and is an avid gardener and disc golfer. He enjoys cooking, traveling, and the outdoors, particularly when his family is also involved.

2 thoughts on “Course Design: Behind the Curtain

  1. Hi, Josh!
    I am currently subscribed to the Instructional Design and Development blog via Google Reader and would like to thank you and your team for regularly posting such interesting and informative articles. I am an avid follower of this blog and especially enjoyed reading your Course Design: Behind the Curtain article.
    My name is Jennifer Richardson. I work in the Academic Affairs department at Ashford University and am currently enrolled in Walden University’s Master of Science in Instructional Design and Technology (MS IDT) program. In my current position as an Academic Document Quality Coordinator, I work on the back end of eCollege, editing course guides (both undergraduate and graduate) and checking for issues related to grammar, clarity, context, formatting, consistency, alignment, universal design, and Quality Matters (QM) standards. When I complete a project, I send my Editorial Review back to the curriculum coordinators, project managers, instructional designers, and executive deans of the respective college. While this process is tedious and time consuming, it is a crucial step in providing best in class service to our students.
    What I found most interesting about this article is how very similar your department’s process is to the one we follow at Ashford. For example, when you discuss the structure of the course itself, you stress the importance of clarity and consistency. When I receive a project to work on, I open it and immediately put on my “student lenses.” The course should be organized in a manner that is logical, consistent, and easy to navigate. If there are components that I find confusing, chances are greater than not our students will too.
    Something your college does differently than ours is the process of document design and conversion. One of the minimum technological requirements for all incoming students at Ashford University is MSOffice suite; however, students are permitted to use web-based versions (e.g., Google docs, Open Office) of these programs – and since Adobe Reader is free, we do tend to provide supplemental materials in PDF form.
    In addition, Ashford has an advantage over other institutions. In April of last year, Bridgepoint Education (our parent company) launched Constellation, a cloud-based publishing system that can be accessed from any computer or device with Internet access and provides students multiple options in accessing their learning materials. With Constellation, students can highlight text and create bookmarks, take interactive assessments, and watch videos that explore concepts in more depth without leaving their book.
    When I completed QM training last year, I recall that universal design, alignment, and consistency were the most common issues educators faced. From your article, it seems as if you and your team are very much on top of these things. I am curious, though, how long did it take you to get to this level of quality in your course design/development process? Were there any specific challenges you/your team faced? If so, what specific steps were taken to overcome them?
    Again, thank you for the great article!
    Sincerely,
    Jennifer Richardson

  2. Josh,

    My name is Judy Dains & I am enrolled at Walden University taking classes towards my Masters in Instructional Design & Technology. Your post was especially interesting to me as I hope to one day be assisting in designing courses also.

    The thing that stood out to me in your description of how you assist teachers in designing and stating the objectives of their courses. As a teacher (middle school) right now, my administration has always stressed for us to use the term “understand” when we are posting our objectives or putting them in our syllabus. What you say makes so much sense as far as having to prove that the students “understand” it. Being able to describe or apply the objective is much more applicable and attainable in seeing if students are actually learning the course material.

    I enjoyed reading this particular post also because to be honest, I had no idea that instructional technologists assisted so much in helping create the actual course design. This was an aspect of the position that I understand much more after reading your post and seeing what is involved in creating an online course of study. A question that came to my mind was how long from beginning to going to publication on the web does it take to design a course? It seems there would have to be a lot of collaboration between both parties which is great.

    Thanks for the information and explanations!
    Judy

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.